6• You are here --> BobAtkins.com > photography > digital > This Page
Tweet |
In a recent Japanese patent filing which has just been published (5/13), Canon showed that they are (or were) still thinking about a sensor similar to the Foveon. For those unfamiliar with sensor technology there are two basic types of digital color sensor.
Conventional sensors (such as are used by Canon, Nikon, Sony, Pentax and most other digital camera manufacturers) consist of a regular array of pixels overlayed by a matrix of red, green and blue filters. Each pixel in the array receives only red or green or blue light and the color assigned to a pixel in the final image is determined by looking at both the pixel itself and it's nearest neighbors. The array of color filters is called the Bayer Matrix and RAW image has to be "demosaiced" to assign an RGB color value to each pixel. One disadvantage of this type of sensor is that much of the light isn't converted to a usable signal. For example the green filter effectively throws away the red and blue light, just as the red filters throw away the green and blue light and the blue filters throw away the red and green light. All that rejected light could have been used to generate a stronger (lower noise) signal if it could all have been used.
Silicon (which is what the pixels are made of) absorbs blue light more strongly then green light, and green light more strongly than red light. Light has to be absorbed to generate the electrical signal used to specify the intensity level of the pixel in the image. Using this fact the Foveon sensor (used by Sigma) can be thought of in simple terms as having three layers. First the light passes though the top thin layer, which absorbs most of the blue light and generates the blue signal. The remaining light is mostly green and red and the next layer absorbs mostly the green light. The final layer is thicker and absorbs mostly the red light which has passed through the other two layers. Using this technique each pixel position records red, green and blue signals.
The problem with the layered system is that the top layer absorbs not only blue, but some red and green. Similarly the middle layer absorbs any remaining blue, plus some of the green and some of the red. The final layer absorbs red as well as any residual green and blue, but maybe not all the red. Clearly not an ideal situation. Possibly more efficient than the Bayer matrix sensor design (at least in theory), though with its own set of problems.
Canon's patent (2013-93553, filed in 2011 but just published now in 2013) - as far as can be told from the Japanese translation - appears to use a multilayer structure like the Foveon sensor, but uses a photonic crystal structure between one (or more?) of the layers. This is a region which can "trap" light of a particular wavelength via a resonance condition. The idea appears to be that these resonant photonic crystal structures effectively "trap" light of a given wavelength (color) within certain regions of the silicon pixel, giving the light a greater probability of being absorbed and maybe a greater wavelength specificity within each region? At a simpler level the same scheme could be applied to just one layer (e.g. the red) to improve the absorption of red light (which is normally least absorbed by silicon). In fact the patent appears to describe such a scheme.
The picture from the Canon patent doesn't shed much light on what they are thinking, but I think the idea is clear. It's to use resonant photonic crystal structure (probably "40" in the figure) to better and perhaps more selectively absorb light within different layers of a pixel and thereby derive both red, green and blue information at each pixel. Of course they could also tune such structures for any wavelength and perhaps also record other colors too.
It should be understood that applying for a patent is absolutely no indication of an actual product. The research arm of all major corporations patent as much as they can think of even if there is no active development program related to the patent. At the very least it makes life more difficult for competitors! However it does show that Canon are at least still thinking about alternatives to the current generation of Bayer matrix sensors.
This isn't the first multi-layer sensor patent by Canon. There was a patent application (2011-129785) filed back in 2009 and published in 2011 which appeared to describe a back illuminated 3 layer sensor which could generate individual red, green and blue signals from one pixel.
Actually Canon already use a multilayer color sensor in the 63 zone metering system found on their current generation of DSLRs. It's actually a two layer system with the top layer sensitive to blue/green light and the bottom layer sensitive to green/red light. It's also a large area sensor for light metering rather than a high resolution small pixel sensor fort imaging, but the principles are the same.
If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to post to the FORUMS here
If you found this article useful, please let others about it using the buttons below...Thanks!
Tweet |
[Return to BobAtkins.com Home Page]
Reviews - Lenses
• See Reviews Section
Reviews - Cameras
• Canon Powershot G11
• Canon EOS 7D
• Digital Rebel T1i
• Canon EOS 5D MkII
• Canon EOS 50D
• Canon Rebel Xsi
• Canon A720is
• Canon EOS 40D
• Sony Alpha A100
• Canon EOS 30D
• Canon EOS 5D
• Digital Rebel XTi
• Canon EOS 20D
• Digital Rebel XT
• Canon EOS 10D
• Canon Digital Rebel
• Canon SD200
• Canon A610
• Canon A80
• HP 707
• HP 945
Reviews - Software
• Picasa v2.5.0
• Paint Shop Pro X
• Paint Shop Pro 9
Previews - Cameras
• Canon EOS 7D
• Sony Alpha A550 and A500
• Sony Alpha A850
• Pentax K7
• Sony Alpha A900
• Nikon D3x
• Canon SX10 is
• Canon EOS 5D MkII
• Nikon D90
• Nikon D3
• Canon EOS 50D
• Digital Rebel XSi
• Canon EOS 1Ds MkIII
• Canon EOS 1D MkIII
• Canon EOS 400D
• Canon EOS 5D
• Canon EOS 1Ds Mk II
• Canon EOS 1D MkII N
• Canon EOS 20Da
• Canon EOS 1D Mark II
• Canon S3 IS
• Canon S2 IS
• Canon A710is
• Canon A630/640
• Canon A620/610
• Canon SD700 IS
• Canon SD630
• Canon SD600
• Canon A410
• Canon G7
• Canon G6
• Canon Pro 1
• Fuji FinePix F30
• Nikon D40
• Nikon D200
• Nikon D50
• Nikon D70
• Nikon D70s
• Nikon D80
• Nikon D300
• Nikon D700
• Nikon 8700
• Maxxum 5D
• Maxxum 7D
• Pentax K10D
• Pentax *ist D
• Pentax *ist DS
• Pentax *ist DL
• Olympus E-330
• Panasonic DMC-FZ28
• Panasonic DMC-LX3
• Samsung Pro815
• Sony Alpha DSLR-A100
Reviews - Printers
• Canon SELPHY CP-510
• Canon i900D
• Canon CP-220
Reviews - Scanners
• Canon FS4000
• Canon d1230u
Guides/Articles
• Portable Data Storage
• Archival Data Storage
• Sensor Cleaning I
• Sensor Cleaning II
• Image Resizing
• Digital Basics
• A Digital FAQ
• EOS 10D or 300D?
• Compact Flash
• Canon News
• Digital Primer
• PMA 2004 digicams
• Digital Rebel Hack
• EOS 20D/300D Lenses
• Choosing Cameras
• Choosing Printers
• Digital Photo Books
All original material on this site is ©Copyright 1995-2017 Bob Atkins - All Rights Reserved.